ESSENTIAL OILS SUMMIT
HISTORY OF THE MODERN MEDICAL MAFIA
AS BALTIMORE BURNS, WATCH OUT FOR MEDICAL CIVIL WAR…
OIL OF OREGANO
ESSENTIAL OILS SUMMIT
People all across the world are scrambling to find natural solutions to their health problems. Of all the “alternative” options, essential oils are currently the hottest trend toward regaining control of your health!
With 31 presentations containing relevant evidence and practical advice from the experts, The Essential Oils Revolution will help you use essential oils effectively and confidently. This event is the first-ever, online, brand-generic event to include experts from every field, including aromatherapy, direct sales, medicine and research.
Register for FREE now at the following link: https://un233.isrefer.com/go/summitreg/CANCERTRUTH/
Important Things You’ll Learn About Essential Oils:
- Understand what essential oils are and why they are popular today
- Why essential oils are nature’s BEST medicine
- How to use essential oils safely and effectively
- Tips for regaining control of your health with essential oils
- Pain and stress remedies using essential oils
- Culinary uses for essential oils
- How to use essential oils for high performance health
- Essential oils for animal aromatherapy
- And so much more!
Here are a few of the incredible experts who will speak at The Essential Oils Revolution:
- Robert Pappas, PhD, Essential Oil Adulteration
- Jordan S. Rubin NMD, PhD, Biblically-Based Essential Oil Uses
- Josh Axe, DC, CNS, Essential Oils for Gut, Thyroid and Adrenals
- Sylla & Nyssa Hanger, MA, LMT, RYT, Essential Oil Safety
- Joette Calabrese, HMC, CCH, RSHom(NA), Homeopath & Mother Raised Children with No Meds, Ever!
With 25+ additional presenters sharing their expertise about essential oils, this invaluable (and FREE) resource is intended for everyone everywhere!
Better yet, if you register today, you’ll have access to the following FREE GIFTS as soon as you register!
- EARLY ACCESS to Dr. Axe’s expert talk, Essential Oils for Gut, Thyroid and Adrenals
- EARLY ACCESS to Dr. Pappas’ expert talk, Essential Oil Adulteration
- The King’s Medicine Cabinet Essential Oils eGuide by Dr. Josh Axe
- The Essential Homestead: Using Essential Oils in the Home, Barnyard and Beyond eBook by Jill Winger
- Using God’s Medicine For The Abundant Life ebook by Dr. Eric L. Zielinski
The Essential Oils Revolution (ONLINE and FREE) from May 11-18, 2015!
Register for FREE at the following link today: https://un233.isrefer.com/go/summitreg/CANCERTRUTH/
I’ll see you at the revolution!
HISTORY OF THE MODERN MEDICAL MAFIA
By Ty Bollinger (Excerpted from Monumental Myths…)
In the words of my good buddy, Robert Scott Bell, the medical industry is nothing short of a “Church of Biological Mysticism” with medical doctors the equivalent of “high priests.” I like that phrase and comparison, and will be elaborating and expanding upon it throughout the book. Despite the fact that M.D.s repeatedly practice “voodoo” medicine and quack science, modern medicine often calls itself “conventional medicine” while pejoratively referring to other systems of medicine as “alternative.”
But modern medicine has only been around a little over 100 years, while traditional medical systems (such as Chinese and Ayurvedic medicine) have been around over 3,000 years. Homeopathy has been around 200 years, chiropractic and naturopathic medicine have been around over 100 years, and of course, people have been using herbs and dietary remedies since the beginning of recorded history.
The reality is that the M.D. “emperors” are buck naked.
I know, I know, right now they may be marching down the street with an entourage of “sheeple” following them who are delusional and pretending that they are actually wearing purple silk robes and golden-threaded paraphernalia. But the day is coming when the entire world will be asking the question: “Why are the M.D. ‘emperors’ naked?”
I’ll tell you why. The “emperors” of modern medicine (aka the M.D.s) have driven the “bus” of medicine over a hazardous cliff, down the mountain, into a perilous swamp, right in the middle of the alligators that haven’t eaten in a long, long time. Why do I say this? In order to understand the current state of affairs of medical practice in the USA, it’s vital to understand exactly how we got here. So, let’s put on our history caps, jump into the time capsule, and go all the way back over 100 years to the turn of the 20th century.
When Dr. George H. Simmons began in 1899 what became a twenty-five year reign as head of the American Medical Association (AMA), it was a weak organization with little money and little respect from the general public. The advertising revenue from its medical journal, the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), was a paltry $34,000 per year. The AMA realized that competition was causing physicians’ incomes to dwindle, as the number of medical schools had increased from around 90 (in 1880) to over 150 (in 1903).
Chiropractic had just been introduced into the mainstream, homeopathy was thriving, herbalists were flourishing, all the while regular doctors were unable to profit from their medical practices. With the state governments reluctant to create laws restricting the various healing arts, Simmons hired Joseph McCormack (the secretary of the Kentucky State Board of health) to “rouse the profession to lobby.” With McCormack leading the charge, the AMA began to bolster their ranks, preaching ethics (like not competing with other physicians or publishing your prices) and decrying “quackery” (anything that competed with regular medicine).
Simmons was shrewd enough to have the AMA establish a Council on Medical Education in 1904. This council’s stated mission was to “upgrade medical education” – a noble goal. However, the Council on Medical Education had actually devised a plan to rank medical schools throughout the country, but their guidelines were dubious, to say the least. For instance, just having the word “homeopathic” in the name of a medical school reduced their ranking because the AMA asserted that such schools taught “an exclusive dogma.”
However, by 1910, the AMA was out of money and didn’t have the funds to complete the project.
The Rockefellers had joined forces with the Carnegie foundation to create an education fund, and they were approached by N. P. Colwell (secretary of the Council on Medical Education) to finish the job they had started, but could no longer fund. Rockefeller and Carnegie agreed. Simon Flexner, who was on the Board of Directors for the Rockefeller Institute, proposed that his brother, Abraham, who knew nothing about medicine, be hired for the project. On a side note, although their names are not very well known, the Flexner brothers have probably influenced the lives of more people and in a more profound way than any other brothers in the last century, with the possible exception of Wilbur and Orville Wright. After going bankrupt attempting to run a boarding school, Abraham Flexner was hired by the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. The Rockefellers and Carnegies had traditionally worked together in the furtherance of their mutual goals, and this certainly was no exception. The Flexner brothers represented the lens that brought both the Rockefeller and the Carnegie fortunes into sharp focus on the medical profession.
Their plan was to “restructure” the AMA and “certify” medical schools based solely upon Flexner’s recommendations. The AMA’s head of the Council on Medical Education traveled with Flexner as they evaluated medical schools. Eventually, Flexner submitted a report to The Carnegie Foundation entitled “Medical Education in the United States and Canada,” which is also known as the “Flexner report.” Not surprisingly, the gist of the report was that it was far too easy to start a medical school and that most medical schools were not teaching “sound medicine.”
The medical sociologist Paul Starr wrote in his Pulitzer Prize-winning book (The Social Transformation of American Medicine): “The AMA Council became a national accrediting agency for medical schools, as an increasing number of states adopted its judgments of unacceptable institutions.” Further, he noted: “Even though no legislative body ever set up … the AMA Council on Medical Education, their decisions came to have the force of law.” With the AMA grading the various medical colleges, it became predictable that the homeopathic colleges, even the large and respected ones, would eventually be forced to stop teaching homeopathy or die. And that’s exactly what happened.
The Flexner Report
Published in 1910, the Flexner report (quite correctly) pointed out the inadequacies of medical education at the time. No one could take exception with that. It also proposed a wide range of sweeping changes, most of which were entirely sound. No one could take exception with those, either. However, Flexner’s recommendations emphatically included the strengthening of courses in pharmacology and the addition of research departments at all “qualified” medical schools.
It is what followed in the wake of the Flexner report that reveals its true purpose in the total plan. With public backing secured by the publication of the Flexner report, Carnegie and Rockefeller commenced a major upgrade in medical education by financing only those medical schools that taught what they wanted taught. In other words, they began to immediately shower hundreds of millions of dollars on those medical schools that were teaching “drug intensive” medicine.
Predictably, those schools that had the financing churned out the better doctors. In return for the financing, the schools were required to continue teaching course material that was exclusively drug oriented, with no emphasis put on natural medicine. The end result of the Flexner report was that all accredited medical schools became heavily oriented toward drugs and drug research. In 1913, Simmons and the AMA went on the offensive even more strongly by their establishment of the “Propaganda Department,” which was dedicated to attacking any and all unconventional medical treatments and anyone (M.D. or not) who practiced them.
The purpose was to dominate the oil and chemical (which eventually became the “pharmaceutical”) markets, and the Flexner report gave both of these tycoons the “ammunition” they needed to achieve that goal. In the end, the Rockefeller/Carnegie plan was a smashing success. Those medical schools that did not conform were denied the funds and the prestige that came with those funds, and were forced out of business.
By 1925, over 10,000 herbalists were out of business. By 1940, over 1500 chiropractors would be prosecuted for practicing “quackery.” The 22 homeopathic medical schools that flourished in 1900 dwindled to just 2 in 1923. By 1950, all schools teaching homeopathy were closed. In the end, if a physician did not graduate from a Flexner approved medical school and receive an M.D. degree, he or she couldn’t find a job.
Trust Me …. I’m a Doctor
The Flexner report was the commencement of a conspiracy to limit and eventually eliminate competition from natural, non-pharmaceutical, non-patentable treatments for disease. This is why today M.D.s are so heavily biased toward synthetic drug therapy and know little about nutrition. They don’t even study health; they study disease. Modern doctors are taught virtually nothing about nutrition, wellness or disease prevention.
Expecting a medical doctor to guide you on health issues is sort of like expecting your CPA to pilot a jet airliner. It’s simply not an area in which they have been trained. That’s not to say M.D.s aren’t intelligent people. Most of them have high IQs. But even a genius can’t teach you something they know nothing about. And, yes, doctors can be fooled, “snookered” and “bamboozled” too, just like the rest of us.
Case in point: Back in the 1920s, the public was becoming increasingly worried about the deleterious health consequences of cigarette smoking. Cigarettes were called “coffin nails” and people started talking about “smoker’s hack.” Executives for “Big Tobacco” were worried, so they began to use doctors (actors of course) in their advertisements to reassure folks that cigarettes were nothing to be concerned about.
During the 1920s, Lucky Strike was the dominant cigarette brand. This brand, made by American Tobacco Company, was the first to use the image of a physician in its advertisements. “20,679 physicians say ‘Luckies are less irritating,” the deceiving ads proclaimed.
The advertising firm that promoted Lucky Strikes had sent physicians free cartons of the cigarettes and asked them whether Lucky Strikes were less irritating to “sensitive and tender” throats. The slogan at the bottom of the ads read, “Your throat protection against irritation and cough.”
The ad below appeared in The Magazine of Wall Street for July 26, 1930. In the small print on the left it says “The figures quoted have been checked and certified to by Lybrand, Ross Bros. & Montgomery, Accountants & Auditors.”
By the mid-1930s, Lucky Strike had some competition. A new advertising campaign for Philip Morris referred to research conducted by physicians. One ad (on the previous page) actually claimed that after prescribing Philip Morris brand cigarettes to patients with irritated throats, “every case of irritation cleared completely or definitely improved.”
There was an interesting paradox in the cigarette ads. For instance, in one ad a company would make the claim that cigarettes aren’t harmful and then in another ad they would say something like “our cigarettes are less harmful than the other brands.”
But, hey, the ads were working.
People were smoking like chimneys and Big Tobacco was blissful. Business was booming! Something that made them even happier was when the JAMA published its first cigarette advertisement in 1933, stating that it had done so only “after careful consideration of the extent to which cigarettes were used by physicians in practice.” Remember the paradox that I just mentioned? It wasn’t confined to cigarette companies. The JAMA also participated in the strange brew of “double think” because at the same time it was running cigarette ads, it also published the first major study to causally link smoking to lung cancer. What to believe? Who knows? Doctors promoted cigarettes in JAMA ads, while JAMA research indicated a lung cancer link. Are you confused yet? I suppose in the land of unicorns and pixie dust, this actually might make sense, but not in the land of reality. Anyway, as I previously mentioned, although the doctors in these advertisements were always actors and not real doctors, the image of the doctor continued to permeate cigarette ads for several decades.
Along comes RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company! In medical journals and in the mainstream media, one of the most infamous cigarette advertising slogans was associated with RJR’s Camel cigarettes: “More doctors smoke Camels than any other cigarette.” These ads pictured doctors in labs, sitting back at their desk or speaking with patients. The campaign began in 1946 and ran for almost a decade in magazines and on the radio.
The Camel ads included this message: “Family physicians, surgeons, diagnosticians, nose and throat specialists, doctors in every branch of medicine… a total of 113,597 doctors… were asked the question: ‘What cigarette do you smoke?’ And more of them named Camel as their smoke than any other cigarette! Three independent research groups found this to be a fact. You see, doctors too smoke for pleasure. That full Camel flavor is just as appealing to a doctor’s taste as to yours… that marvelous Camel mildness means just as much to his throat as to yours.”
The first research to make a statistical correlation between cancer and smoking was published in 1930 in Cologne, Germany. In 1938, Dr. Raymond Pearl of Johns Hopkins University reported that smokers do not live as long as non-smokers. The tobacco industry dismissed these early findings as “anecdotal” while at the same time recruiting doctors to endorse cigarettes.
Did doctors really believe that smoking was good for you? You betcha. They were mesmerized and brainwashed just like everybody else. It was almost like they were on a bad “acid trip” or had smoked too much crack! There were big cigarette ad campaigns in medical journals. For example, there is an ad showing a physician writing on a prescription pad which states, “For your patients with sore throats and cough, Phillip Morris cigarettes.”
But remember…every myth eventually gets busted!
On Jan. 11, 1964, Surgeon General Luther Terry announced the findings of the Surgeon General’s Advisory Committee on Smoking and Health. The report, Smoking and Health: Report of the Advisory Committee to the Surgeon General of the United States, concluded that there was a link between lung cancer and chronic bronchitis and cigarette smoking. In a press conference, Terry said, “It is the judgment of the committee that cigarette smoking contributes substantially to mortality from certain specific diseases and to the overall death rate.” By the end of 1965, the tobacco industry was required to put warning labels on its products and advertisements to warn the public of the health risks associated with smoking.
After a couple hundred years of tobacco use, tobacco companies would lose several more major battles throughout the next few decades, including the ban on television ads in 1970 when President Nixon signed the Public Health Cigarette Smoking Act. Despite all this, over 50 million Americans still smoke and almost half a million die prematurely as a result of tobacco products.
In his book, The Cigarette Century: The Rise, Fall and Deadly Persistence of the Product that Defined America, Allan M. Brandt (Harvard medical historian) documented the role that medical “research” played in the cigarette debate. After studying research, court transcripts, and formerly restricted Big Tobacco memoranda, he summed up the misleading nature of “expert” medical testimony in tobacco litigation: “I was appalled by what the tobacco expert witnesses had written. By asking narrow questions and responding to them with narrow research, they provided precisely the cover the industry sought.”
It is important to understand this little history lesson in order to understand better how the field of medicine has come to be what it is now, and to debunk the myth that M.D.s are demi-gods and they should be worshiped as omniscient in their field. In essence, due in large part to the Flexner report, we have a clandestine medical dictatorship.
In this medical dictatorship, what we constantly find is a series of myths, cons, and frauds perpetrated against “we the people,” masterminded by profit-seeking medical groups conspiring with multinational corporations (like Big Pharma, Big Agra, and Big Tobacco) to maximize profits at the expense of public health. Although the myths have changed (i.e. the AMA isn’t pushing cigarettes anymore), thanks to the Flexner report, the Medical Mafia is still pushing deadly drugs that will one day be regarded to be just as absurd as smoking.
Let’s get real here, folks.
Drug intensive therapy is miserably outdated, ineffective, and downright dangerous. Nobody with half a brain actually believes that drugs help people heal. Drugs harm. Drugs kill. Drugs cause addiction. I predict that in the near future (or maybe, like “Star Wars,” in a distant galaxy far, far away), scientists will look back on medicine today with astonishment at how an industry with such malicious and greedy intentions could have gained so much influence. In the words of Dr. Richard Shulze, ND, “We’re going to look back at this century and we’re going to laugh eventually, but we’ll cry first. This is one of the most barbaric periods. It’s going to be called the ‘Dark Ages’ of Medicine.”
In summary, the Flexner report coupled with the enigmatic veil of secrecy and mystery which is associated with a “medical degree” and the bizarre propensity for most folks to defer to anyone in an apparent position of authority (regardless of whether or not it is merited) has resulted in a recipe for disaster. The bottom line is that M.D.s are in the “driver’s seat of modern medicine’s Maserati” only because of financial coalitions that were organized at the turn of the 20th century. Or, an easier way to say it: M.D.s owe their preeminent medical and social status to drug money.
According to my friend, Dr. Robert J. Rowen, M.D., in his Second Opinion Newsletter, “In my humble opinion, the best way to improve the health of the nation is to cease visiting conventional doctors for ANYTHING at all except emergency conditions. Statins are a scam. Treating for blood pressure when systolic is less than 160 has no significant benefit. Most vaccines are a total sham and highly toxic. You can replace most pain pills with natural substances avoiding burning a hole in your gut with NSAID chemicals. And adult diabetes is totally curable with diet and exercise. Back surgery has a 50% ‘make-you-worse’ rate, most knee arthroscopy is worthless in the long run, and cancer-screening treatment is a total catastrophe. … It’s vital we show everyone that this emperor (conventional medicine) has no clothes.”
by Ty Bollinger
Resveratrol is a “polyphenol” found in the skin of dark grapes that is produced naturally when the plant is under attack by pathogens such as bacteria or fungi. What is a “polyphenol“? If you look at the attached photo, the two hexagons in the structure of the molecules are called “aromatic rings” and the OH groups are called “hydroxyl” groups. When aromatic rings and hydroxyl groups are together, the chemical is called a “phenol.” Since there is more than one of these phenols present, resveratrol is a “polyphenol.”
Polyphenols are often associated with compounds that are antioxidants. This is because they can react with free radicals to form a more stable molecule; one that is less toxic than the original radical. Since resveratrol’s prime function in nature is to protect the fruit against pathogens, it only makes sense that it would exhibit potent anti-fungal activity in the human body, which it does. It also destroys candida albicans.
Reseveratrol has been shown to exhibit “selective toxicity” toward cancer cells. How? Reseveratrol is virtually non-toxic since, after oral ingestion, it is quickly metabolized by the liver, attached to a detoxification molecule called “glucuronate,” which renders it harmless. However, at the tumor site, the resveratrol is unzipped by an enzyme called “glucuronidase” that uncouples it from the glucuronate and makes it available to “go to work” on the cancer cells.
In studies published in the March 2004 Anticancer Research, resveratrol and curcumin impeded tumor cell growth and induced apoptosis in neuroblastomas (brain cancer) by activating the p53 gene pathway. In addition to inducing apoptosis, resveratrol appears to kill off cancer cells by depolarizing (i.e. demagnetizing) mitochondrial membranes (the energy source) within tumor cells, which results in a decrease in the cells potential to function.
Resveratrol is a dozen cancer-fighting drugs all wrapped up into one.
It is another of God’s natural cancer killers and fights cancer in so many ways that researchers can’t find a cancer-promotion pathway it doesn’t inhibit. It has been suggested that resveratrol underlies the phenomenon known as the “French paradox,” which is the unexplained fact that the French, who have the same cholesterol levels as the rest of us, have only one-third the rate of heart disease. Why? Because the French drink wine with meals, and red wine contains a high concentration of resveratrol. The W.H.O. has suggested that resveratrol can reduce cardiovascular risks by up to 40%, since it blocks platelet “stickiness,” prevents oxidation of LDL’s, reduces triglyceride levels, and (most importantly) reduces tension levels, thus relaxing and dilating the arteries.
Other beneficial effects include increases in collagen synthesis and amelioration of depression. To date, no side effects, toxic symptoms, or drug interactions have been reported in connection with resveratrol consumption. Not surprisingly, resveratrol has also caught the eye of several Big Pharma companies who are already trying to capture its benefits in a synthetic, patentable, and expensive drug. My prediction: it will NOT work. Any time man tries to modify what God made and “improve” on His creation, it never works!
AS BALTIMORE BURNS, WATCH OUT FOR MEDICAL CIVIL WAR…
by Mike Adams, the “Health Ranger”
(NaturalNews) It is a fundamental and non-debatable scientific truth that all vaccines have inherent health risks. The spectrum of harm varies widely, from small skin rashes to full-blown neurological damage and lifelong debilitation. Some children have even been killed by vaccines, and the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program has paid out nearly $3 billion to families of children who were provably injured by vaccines in America.
The UK government, similarly, has just agreed to $90 million in financial compensation to victims who suffered permanent brain damage from another vaccine. (You will not find any truthful reporting on vaccine injuries in quackpot mainstream media publishers like the Washington Post, of course. They are largely funded by Big Pharma and therefore propagate the junk science delusion that vaccines never cause any injuries at all.)
Because vaccines have the potential to cause harm — and do indeed cause severe harm, injury and even death for some children — when they are forced upon people against their wishes and consent, they represent a form of medical violence against women and children.
“Vaccine Violence” is very real, in other words, and it is a form of violence against women and children that the state of California wants to commit via government coercion. That’s the whole point of SB 277, the so-called “vaccine mandate” law. It seeks to eliminate all religious or philosophical exemptions from vaccines, thereby forcing a potentially harmful medical intervention onto the bodies of children (and soon, adults) who did NOT give consent to the procedure.
As the SB 277 website explains, “If there is a RISK, there must be a CHOICE.”
Federal sentencing guidelines characterize a vaccine assault as a serious felony crime
As background on this point, it is important to note that individuals carrying the HIV virus have been charged with felony assault crimes for spitting on people or engaging in sexual intercourse with them.
The state of Ohio, for example, considers it a “felonious assault” to be an HIV-positive person and have sex with someone without informing them of your HIV status. (SOURCE) Those found guilty of this assault are sentenced to up to 11 years in prison.
This is because HIV-positive people are generally believed to carry live viruses which can enter another person’s body and cause them harm. This is precisely the same situation encountered with many vaccines, where faulty quality control procedures have resulted in “live” viruses being administered to people through polio vaccines (see the history of 98 million Americans exposed to cancer viruses via polio vaccines), MMR vaccines (which shed live viruses, causing the recently vaccinated to readily infect others), flu vaccines and many more.
According to federal law enforcement, a needle is categorized as a “weapon” in the context of a physical assault. For example, if you were to acquire the blood of an HIV-positive person, fill a syringe with it, then assault someone with that needle, you would not only be charged with a felony assault, but an assault with a deadly weapon (the needle).
Under Ohio law, for example, it is explained as: “…causing or attempting to cause serious harm with a deadly weapon or a firearm — referred to in the Ohio statutes as a ‘dangerous ordnance.'”
When administered without consent, a vaccine injection is a physical violation of a human body. The substance contained in the vaccine is provably harmful and, in some cases, even deadly. Under Ohio sentencing guidelines, an individual forcing a vaccination upon someone without their consent would be committing a “felonious assault with dangerous ordnance.”
Federal sentencing guidelines and vaccine violence
Under federal sentencing guidelines, a vaccine assault upon an individual without their consent would be considered an “aggravated assault,” part of the category of sentencing covering “offenses against the persons.”
As explained in this sentencing guidelines document, the “base offense level” of a vaccine assault (i.e. aggravated assault) is 14.
This document goes on to explain, “If the assault involved more than minimal planning, increase by 2 levels.” Because all vaccine violence against children is premeditated, it qualifies as “more than minimal planning.”
This sentencing guideline also explains “[if] a dangerous weapon (including a firearm) was otherwise used, increase by 4 levels.” Because a needle containing a potentially dangerous substance is considered a “dangerous weapon” by all law enforcement organizations — including local police, the FBI, etc. — this elevates the vaccine violence to an even higher level.
If that needle weapon “…was brandished or its use was threatened, increase by 3 levels,” says the sentencing guidelines document.
Where injury occurs, the aggravated assault becomes even more serious
“If the victim sustained bodily injury, increase the offense level according to the seriousness of the injury,” says the federal sentencing guidelines document.
Bodily Injury = + 3 levels
Serious Bodily Injury = +5 levels
Permanent or Life-Threatening Bodily Injury = +7 levels
Permanent bodily injury would include brain damage or autism, by the way, both of which are caused by vaccines. Even the CDC has evidence that vaccines increase the risk of autism, as publicly admitted by CDC scientist and whistleblower William Thompson. We also know as an established fact that vaccines cause permanent brain damage. The UK government, in fact, just agreed to pay out $90 million in financial awards to families whose children were brain damaged by the swine flu vaccine.
Finally, this sentencing guideline document explains, “If the assault was motivated by a payment or offer of money or other thing of value, increase by 2 levels.”
Because virtually all doctors are financially influenced by vaccine manufacturers through extensive bribery networks, they are also guilty of being “financially motivated” to participate in the vaccine assault of an innocent child. This would add +2 levels to their sentencing. (Flashback: GlaxoSmithKline admits to running massive illegal bribery network involving 40,000 doctors across the United States. The U.S. Justice Dept. prosecuted this case after a company whistleblower stepped forward.)
In total, an act of vaccine violence against a non-consenting person would qualify, under U.S. federal sentencing guidelines, as a Base Offense Level of 22 even if no injury was sustained by the child. If an injury is sustained, that Base Offense Level could rise to 25, 27 or 29 in the case of permanent brain damage.
Why doctors committing vaccine violence against children would earn 41 months (or more) in federal prison
What do these numbers mean in terms of sentencing?
A base offense level of 29 would result in 87 months in federal prison.
An act of vaccine violence committed against a non-consenting person, if prosecuted by law enforcement authorities, could earn a doctor serious prison time regardless of whether the child was actually injured by the vaccine.
Will California parents start calling 911 and pressing assault charges against doctors?
All this brings up a very important question for Californians, SB 277, medical freedom and the rule of law.
If California claims to be a state operating under the rule of law, then laws regarding aggravated assault must apply equally to all people, including doctors. If an adult or child is forcibly violated against their consent with a needle weapon known to pose a real threat to that child’s safety, that act clearly qualifies as aggravated assault.
Under both federal and state law, parents who believe their children face the risk of imminent harm from a violent attack upon their bodies have every right to call 911 and request armed police officers come to their defense to stop the assault and arrest those attempting to commit those acts of violence.
I am now publicly predicting that, should SB 277 be signed into law, we will see a wave of California parents calling 911 to report their doctors while demanding the government press felony assault charges against medical personnel engaged in vaccine violence.
It is doubtful, of course, that District Attorneys would carry out any government-sponsored prosecution of those doctors, but parents will retain the right of CIVIL prosecution of those doctors for violating their civil rights.
Doctors have no immunity against civil lawsuits stemming from vaccine violence
The civil prosecution of those administering forced vaccines upon children is not in any way protected by the legal immunity from liability which has been granted to pharmaceutical companies by Congress. That protection only exempts the drug companies from lawsuits of injury and harm caused by vaccines. It does not confer any legal immunity to doctors and medical personnel who personally engage in the acts of violence — i.e. administer the vaccines — against the consent of the parent(s).
In a court of law, there can be little doubt that a coercive violation of a child’s body with a potentially deadly substance is a violation of that child’s civil rights (and human rights). An assault with a vaccine needle is no less of a crime than an assault with a surgeon’s scalpel. Both are “medical instruments” which may cause permanent damage and even death.
The “intent” of the doctor administering the vaccine in no way immunizes that doctor from the letter of the law. Even if the doctor testifies that he “intends” to protect the child, that does not negate the fact that he willfully carried out a felony assault upon the body of that child with a dangerous weapon. There is exhaustive legal precedent to support my contention here. While intent is a factor in sentencing, it alone does not negate the act of assault with a dangerous weapon.
All that is necessary to see this happen is for parents to start calling the police
Fascinatingly, California parents already have the power to unleash this law enforcement campaign against anyone administering vaccines without consent. State and federal laws are written to protect innocent victims against their bodies being physically violated / assaulted, and citizens merely need to invoke those laws which already exist.
Parents who believe their children are being placed in harm’s way by vaccine violence might call 911, demand police arrive on the scene, and express their genuine belief that their children are about to be assaulted with a dangerous weapon. Of course, parents engaging in this action might risk a visitation by Child Protective Services, another enforcement arm of an oppressive government that demands obedience to the pharmaceutical industry’s profit agendas. So parents must carefully weigh the risks associated with their actions in this context. (Personally, I would never recommend a parent call 911 on a “vaccine violence” doctor unless they first consult with an attorney and have a solid legal strategy in mind.)
If hundreds (or thousands) of parents do this across the state, it would bring the issue of vaccine violence to the surface, demanding a legal review of the practice of physically violating a person’s body with a potentially harmful medical intervention in violation of medical ethics and medical consent. It might even result in the successful prosecution of a doctor for aggravated assault, sending an important message across the entire medical profession that you are not immune to the laws of the land. You may not commit acts of medical violence against children without simultaneously subjecting yourself to legal or civil consequences in a court of law.
Why SB 277 brings all this to the surface
When vaccines are optional, doctors injecting them are only engaged in a controversial “treatment.” But when vaccines are coerced by the state, doctors are now colluding with a state-sponsored system of coercion that combines medical violence with the threat of denying a child their right to an education. Thus, the doctor is now playing a key role in the coercion / collusion which demands a child be physically violated with a harmful substance administered via what law enforcement already recognizes as a “dangerous weapon.”
The doctor, in other words, is now a “co-conspirator” in the aggravated assault of the child. Under federal law, in fact, that doctor could technically be charged with conspiracy on top of the aggravated assault charge.
Suddenly, the doctor is in the position of carrying out an act of violence which is resisted by the parent. The context is now different: it’s no longer “medical treatment” but rather “medical violence.” Acts of violence against children are illegal under California law and federal law, opening up doctors to being charged, prosecuted and sentenced to prison for their role in the scheme.
Doctors may soon start requiring consent signatures from parents
For this reason, I now expect that many medical professionals in California who administer vaccines will begin requiring signatures on consent forms. This is their primary protection from being sued — or potentially arrested — if caught engaging in vaccine violence committed against a child.
Such “consent forms,” interestingly, would have to include detailed descriptions of the potential side effects of vaccines in order to be recognized as valid. If the forms fail to provide the parent with full details of the vaccine side effects, the parent can rightfully claim they were not given “informed consent” and would therefore have a very strong civil liability case against the doctor.
SB 277 is what changes the context of all this. If it is signed into law, it will force parents who are adamantly opposed to vaccines to have their children vaccinated without their consent. These parents are rightly motivated to protect the health and lives of their children, which is why I predict we will see all the following taking place if SB 277 is signed into law:
1) Parents calling 911 on their doctors and demanding they be arrested for felony assault via vaccine violence.
2) Parents hiring lawyers to file civil lawsuits against pharmacies like CVS and Walgreens where vaccines are administered.
3) Parents of vaccine-injured children who were coerced into vaccination by SB 277 mounting new challenges under civil rights law. A case most likely to receive media attention and social media traction would involve an African-American child damaged by vaccines who was forced to be vaccinated due to SB 277. Under a properly-configured legal challenge, this family could sue the state of California, the clinic administering and vaccine and possibly even take a vaccine injury challenge back to the U.S. Supreme Court which might overturn its previous decision on Big Pharma’s legal immunity. (The logic demands a review when the vaccines are now coerced rather than voluntary.)
In other words, if Gov. Jerry Brown signs SB 277 into law, he will unleash a “medical civil war” in California, involving protests from outraged parents and possibly even billions of dollars in medical liability on the state of California itself.
Sadly, the vaccine industry is so desperate to force compliance with its for-profit agenda that it will pull out all the stops to see this bill signed into law. Expect a medical civil war to erupt in California if Gov. Brown signs this, pitting doctors against patients… with law enforcement and civil rights attorneys thrown into the mix for good measure.
OIL OF OREGANO
by Ty Bollinger
Oil of oregano, an herbal product that has been used since Biblical times, is extracted from wild oregano plants. It has been shown to kill parasites and viruses, bacteria, and some types of fungi, as well as being an antihistamine.
Oil of oregano has been used for centuries to treat infections and it might be a savior for sufferers of colitis, an inflammation in the gastrointestinal system. It is derived from the wild oregano plant (member of the mint family) that grows naturally in the mountains of the Mediterranean region and is usually bottled and mixed with olive oil or coconut oil because of its potency.
The lead ingredient in oregano oil is carvacrol, a strong antimicrobial used to preserve food and protect against mold and other common bacteria, making it the largest healing agent of the oil. Thymol is the second most active ingredient important as a fungicide and is the leading anti-halitosis (i.e., bad-breath fighting) agent in Listerine. The rest of the ingredients provide more antibacterial support, prevent the damage caused by free radicals, act as allergen-blockers, and inhibit the growth of cancer cells.
Oil of oregano also contains copper, calcium, niacin, zinc, boron, beta-carotene, vitamins A, C, and E, potassium and iron among others. Jean Valnet, in his book The Practice of Aromatherapy, describes how oil of oregano has superseded anti-inflammatory drugs in reversing pain and inflammation and is nearly as powerful as morphine as a painkiller. It possesses significant antioxidant power and also stimulates the flow of bile in the liver, which greatly aids digestion.
Dr. Cass Ingram wrote a book called The Cure is in the Cupboard: How to Use Oregano for Better Health about his life-saving encounter with oil of oregano. This “super oil,” he claims, is helpful in calming or healing over 170 different bodily conditions – everything from athlete’s foot to worms, diarrhea to diaper rash, a bee sting to shortness of breath. Makes you want to go buy some oil of oregano right now, doesn’t it?
However, before you go online or to your local herb store, make sure you do your research. Whichever brand you decide to purchase, make sure that the oil is at least 70% carvacrol. It is important to note that oil of oregano is not recommended for anyone allergic to oregano, thyme, basil, mint, or sage. Oil of oregano can also reduce iron intake within the body, so you should consider taking a good iron supplement. Due to this fact, pregnant women shouldn’t take oil of oregano.
The body of positive evidence for oregano oil as a major antibiotic is growing. Among 52 plant oils tested, oregano was considered to have “pharmacologic” action against common bugs such as Candida albicans (yeast), E. coli, Salmonella enterica, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. (Journal Applied Microbiology, Volume 86, June 1999)
by Ty Bollinger
When it comes to basic nutrients, broccoli is a mother lode. Ounce for ounce, boiled broccoli has more vitamin C than an orange and as much calcium as a glass of milk. But that’s not all. Broccoli is a powerful anti-cancer veggie.
Here’s why: According to a January 2011 article in The Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, proteins coded by the gene p53 help keep cancer from starting to grow. But when the p53 gene is mutated, the protection is gone. Mutated p53 is implicated in about half of all human cancers. Broccoli and its relatives are rich in compounds called isothiocyanates (ITCs), which apparently destroy the products of the mutant p53 gene, but leave the healthy p53 proteins alone and free to suppress tumor development. Of the millions of plant chemicals contained in our common foods, ITCs, are currently among the most studied. They not only block mutant p53 genes, but they also detoxify potential carcinogens such as environmental toxins. Researchers at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in Baltimore isolated from broccoli an isothiocyanate (called sulforaphane) that increases the activity of a group of enzymes in our bodies that squelch cancer-causing agents. Broccoli also contains a couple of important chemicals referred to as “indoles”: diindolylmethane (DIM) and its precursor, indole-3-carbinol (I3C).
I3C is the real reason that “eat your broccoli” has always been good nutritional advice. According to a recent article in The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry, “Mounting preclinical and clinical evidence indicate[s] that indole-3-carbinol (I3C), a key bio-active food component in cruciferous vegetables, has multiple anticarcinogenic and antitumorigenic properties.” I3C halts cancer cell growth by interfering with the production of proteins involved in abnormal cellular reproduction, and by promoting the production of tumor-suppressor proteins. I3C has also been shown to induce apoptosis (programmed cell death) in cancer cells, and a 2005 article in the Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry suggests that I3C also interferes with angiogenesis (the formation of new blood vessels) which tumors rely on for nutrients and oxygen. Perhaps the single most important mechanism of action of I3C and DIM is modulating estrogen metabolism. I’ll try to explain why…
The enzymes 2-hydroxylase and 16-alpha-hydroxylase help to metabolize estrogens. Several years ago, scientists hypothesized that estrogen metabolism via the 2-hydroxylase pathway [which generates 2-hydroxyestrone (2-OHE1)] results in a reduction of “bad” estrogen, which decreases the risk of breast cancer. However, they also theorized that estrogen metabolism via the 16-alpha-hydroxylase pathway [which generates a more biologically potent form of estrogen, 16-alpha-hydroxyestrone (16a-OHE1)] should increase the risk of breast cancer.
This hypothesis was confirmed in 2000, when scientists with the ORDET study analyzed data gathered on more than 10,000 Italian women over 5 years, examining diet and other factors associated with breast cancer risk. The researchers found that a higher ratio of “good” 2-OHE1 to “bad” 16a-OHE1 at the beginning of the study was significantly associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer. Subsequent studies of different populations have supported this finding, and the ratio of these two estrogen metabolites is now widely regarded as an indicator for the risk of breast and other hormone-associated cancers, with a higher 2-OHE1:16a-OHE1 ratio considered desirable.
A poor ratio of these estrogen metabolites is promoted by obesity and exposure to a number of man-made environmental chemicals, and they are responsible for many of estrogen’s undesirable actions in women and men, including further unwanted weight gain, breast cancer, and uterine cancer. In addition, a slow metabolism of estrogen, which leaves too much unmetabolized active estrogen known as “estradiol” in the body, can be a serious problem for both women and men.
What does this have to do with broccoli? Well, according to numerous studies (including a 1997 article published in the Journal of the NCI), I3C shifts the metabolism of estradiol from the dangerous 16-alpha-hydroxylase pathway to the 2-hydroxylase pathway. As a result, consumption of I3C boosts the ratio of 2-OHE1:16a-OHE1, thus reducing the risk of breast, prostate, cervical, and several other types of cancer.
Many scientists believe that I3C’s beneficial effects are partly driven by one of its principal byproducts, DIM. Recently, scientists working with cell cultures showed that DIM activates cellular stress response pathways in breast, prostate, and cervical cancer cells. This response mimics the reaction of cells deprived of adequate nutrition, further enhancing the cells’ susceptibility to destruction. In a 2003 article in Food & Chemical Toxicology, researchers showed that both DIM and I3C induce cell death in prostate cancer cells.
Well, as my mother used to say, there’s “oodles and gobs” more information I could share with you about the amazing health benefits of broccoli, but I think that’s enough for one sitting. The bottom line is that in the category of “most healthy vegetable,” this “crunchy cruciferous contender” wins top honors. So, the next time you feel like “pigging out,” why not go on a “broccoli binge?”
OK, enough for this time. But stay tuned. My next monthly newsletter will have more great info.
And please remember that CANCER DOES NOT HAVE TO BE A DEATH SENTENCE!
Thanks and God bless.